Everyone's fussing over the new Bronco

"If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent" (essextee)
10/04/2016 at 21:23 • Filed to: None

Meanwhile I’m just sitting here waiting for Ford to bring the Troller stateside.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 21:24

I thought “Ford Troller” was every guy with a Camaro who comments first on a “Mustang wrecks at cars & coffee” video.

Nope, it’s a south american wrangler competitor.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 21:27

I know

Do you though?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 21:30

I...I think so?

Probenja > sm70- why not Duesenberg?
10/04/2016 at 21:30

That is because the brand is Troller, not Ford. You don’t call a Lincoln MKZ a “Ford Lincoln”, although that could work as a new luxury model.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Probenja
10/04/2016 at 21:33

Ah gotcha.

But do you know so?

dogisbadob > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 21:35

OJ’s saving up his prison job income on a deposit :p

My citroen won't start > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 23:01

A neighbour has green one. It is positively terrible and noisy.

Nobody buys an offroader to be considerate.

My citroen won't start > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/04/2016 at 23:17

no, inside noise.

Illegitimus Prime > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/06/2016 at 12:52

This is possibly the greatest car name ever.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/06/2016 at 21:28

That will bring us back to do?

To do what?

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > If only EssExTee could be so grossly incandescent
10/06/2016 at 21:30

!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!